A UX audit can make or break your website. It's a deep dive into how users are using your site...
Web analytics tools, specifically user behavior analytics, are a must for understanding how visitors interact with your website—beyond just basic metrics like page traffic or churn rate. These tools help you gain valuable insights to improve user experience, but they each have their quirks.
Hotjar provides website heatmap tools, session recordings, and surveys, but its pricing can be steep for websites with high traffic, and its analytics features may feel somewhat restricted. In contrast, Smartlook delivers comprehensive session recordings and heatmaps, although analyzing the vast amount of data can be time-consuming.
FullSession stands out as the best alternative, offering a comprehensive suite of tools that includes real-time session recordings and replays, interactive heatmaps, feedback forms, funnel optimization, and error analysis. This all-encompassing approach allows you to capture, visualize, analyze and optimize the entire user journey without compromising website performance.
In this article, we’ll compare Hotjar vs Smartlook, then introduce FullSession as the all-in-one solution that might just be the better fit for your needs. Stick around to find out which user behavior analytics tool is best for your team.
Start a Free Trial to Experience FullSession
Capture all user interactions, spot trends and patterns and drive improvements without compromising your website performance.
Before we get into details of the Hotjar vs. Smartlook comparison, let's discuss why FullSession might be the right behavior analytics tool for you.
While Smartlook and Hotjar seem like great options for tracking user behavior, could there be a better alternative?
Let us highlight advanced FullSession features and explain why this platform may be a better alternative for capturing user interactions and gathering visual insights that help you optimize your website.
FullSession isn’t just another analytics tool—it’s designed to give you a deeper, more complete understanding of your users. Here’s how FullSession makes a difference:
Now, why choose FullSession over Hotjar or Smartlook? While Hotjar can slow down your site and Smartlook’s session data can be time-consuming to review, FullSession offers a more streamlined and efficient experience. It provides deeper insights, better performance, and a more comprehensive set of tools to help you optimize your website effectively.
Ready to see FullSession in action? Book a demo today and experience the difference for yourself!
Image source: G2
Hotjar is a conversion optimization tool that tracks your web visitors’ behavior and provides you with insights to help you increase your website's performance rate.
With Hotjar, product managers, UX designers, and researchers can discover user pain points, analyze user behavior, understand user actions, and improve customer experience (CX).
Image source: G2
Smartlook is analytics software for websites and mobile apps that lets businesses track customer behavior.
With Smartlook, product managers, developers, UX designers, and marketers can make informed decisions about optimizing product performance.
Below, you can compare Hotjar and Smartlook to spot where their features overlap and what unique features each solution provides. This insight can make a big difference in analyzing your website visitors’ actions. We’ll also highlight more information about FullSession to see how it compares to these products.
Both Hotjar and Smartlook provide session recordings and heatmaps and have an easy set-up process. You’ll learn more about their differences, use cases, deployment, features, user ratings, language, and integrations as you read further.
Let’s start with the basics.
You can use Smartlook to track user interaction on websites and mobile apps, while Hotjar doesn’t track user behavior on mobile apps and doesn’t provide mobile analytics.
UX designers, product managers, customer support teams, and digital marketers use Hotjar in their everyday work. Smartlook targets small businesses, agencies, and digital marketers.
One of the most significant differences between Hotjar and Smartlook lies in the filter options for session recordings and heatmaps. For example, with Hotjar, you can filter session recordings by user feedback, while Smartlook doesn’t provide this feature. However, Smartlook lets you filter session recordings by events.
In another context, Smartlook includes funnel analysis to help you understand the user navigation, and you can use this feature as a filter for session recordings. In contrast, Hotjar has Hotjar funnels, which allow you to visualize funnel steps in each user session.
What about FullSession?
FullSession is perfect for businesses of all sizes, especially eCommerce sites, because it gives you clear, actionable insights into how customers interact with your site.
With real-time session recordings, you can see exactly where shoppers get stuck or drop off, helping you fine-tune the user experience. The interactive heatmaps show you which products and pages grab the most attention so you can optimize for more conversions.
Plus, conversion funnel analysis helps you spot and fix any hurdles in the buying process, making it easier for customers to complete their purchases.
It also provides data on web and mobile user sessions. Book a demo today to see it in action.
Both Hotjar and Smartlook have shown promising results. We’ll highlight user ratings based on two popular review sites: TrustRadius and G2.
Since Hotjar and Smartlook have similar features, there’s also some overlap in their use cases.
Image source: G2
If you want to get a closer look at how these features work, schedule a demo today.
The deployment between Hotjar and Smartlook is quite different. With Smartlook, there are a few ways to install the software.
For instance, you can add the code snippet by copying and pasting it into your website's source code. You can also implement Smartlook on your website via Google Tag Manager. You have to create a custom HTML tag with the tracking code.
Hotjar offers several installation options. For instance, you can install the Hotjar JavaScript snippet by manually adding the code to your website.
After installing, tracking user actions represents a crucial difference between these solutions. For example, with Hotjar, you need to describe specific events by creating custom JavaScript code and using events API to track user-specific actions.
It can be challenging if you don’t have enough technical knowledge. In contrast, once you install the code snippet, Smartlook automatically tracks user interactions.
Deploying FullSession is quick and easy. First, go to Settings > Data Capture and Privacy > FullSession Setup to get the data capture snippet.
Paste it into the <HEAD> section of your website or app—via your CMS or directly in the code. The snippet works silently in the background, capturing all user interactions without requiring any manual setup.
To protect sensitive data, you can use the "Excluded Elements" feature to block specific information by identifying CSS selectors, ensuring privacy. Manage these settings under Settings > Data Capture and Privacy > Privacy.
Finally, invite your team members to collaborate while you wait for sessions to populate.
Start a free trial to see how it works.
As we mentioned earlier, Hotjar and Smartlook share similar features, but there are cases where these features differ.
The language is where Hotjar and Smartlook contrast greatly. The Smartlook interface is only available in English.
While the Hotjar interface is also available in English, the software’s user-facing features, such as surveys and feedback, are available in multiple languages, including Arabic, Dutch, French, Chinese, Italian, Bulgarian, Ukrainian, and more!
FullSession is available in English, French, and Arabic.
Both Hotjar and Smartlook offer extensive integrations. They share similar integration options with A/B testing and conversion rate optimization tools.
Both software integrates well with tools used by digital marketing experts like Segment, Google Optimize, and Zapier. Another similarity in their integration is that both tools are compatible with WordPress, Shopify, and Joomla.
There are some integration options you can find in Hotjar and not Smartlook. For example, Hotjar integrates with popular project management tools like Basecamp, Asana, ClickUp, Notion, and Trello. In contrast, Smartlook doesn’t.
Thanks to open APIs, native integrations, and modern webhooks, FullSession lets you integrate your entire stack. You can use it with major platforms like Wix, Shopify, BigCommerce and WordPress.
Start a free trial now.
No tool is perfect, and issues can arise. For this reason, customers need efficient and reliable support. Hotjar and Smartlook customer support differ slightly.
Hotjar includes email support, ticket submissions, and training in all pricing plans. However, the absence of live chat disadvantages Hotjar since most customers prefer to communicate via live support.
In contrast, Smartlook provides email support, ticket submission, training, and live support. Only the Startup and Business plans include access to live support, so you need to upgrade your account.
Meanwhile, FullSession offers a help center where you can find guides on how to set up and use the platform. You can also contact FullSession support via email and live chat.
Both Hotjar and Smartlook offer pricing plans suitable for startups, SMBs, and enterprises.
Hotjar has three paid plans:
If you want only the basic features, you can try their free version. However, you only get up to 35 sessions per day.
The pricing plan for Smartlook includes four plans – Free, Pro, and Enterprise. Here are more details on each plan:
As you can see, Hotjar and Smartlook pricing plans also differ. For example, all Smartlook pricing plans include a 30-day free trial, while Hotjar offers a 15-day free trial for new accounts and a 30-day money-back guarantee.
As for FullSession, you can choose from one of three premium plans:
Take note of a 20% discount when you sign up for an annual plan. For more information, you check out the Pricing page.
So far, we have highlighted key features of FullSession and where it overlaps with Hotjar and Smartlook. If you need more details on how Hotjar tracks user activity, check out this article on our unbiased Hotjar feedback.
To keep things simple and easy to grasp, here’s a detailed table that summarizes FullSession features compared to Hotjar and Smartlook.
FullSession | Smartlook | Hotjar | |
Session recordings | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Engagement score | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ |
Session replay | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Advanced user filtering | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Recording timeline with pages and average time on each page | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ |
Real-time session recording | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Sharing option | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Heatmaps | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Click/tap heatmaps | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Scroll heatmaps | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Live heatmaps | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ |
Feedback collection | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ |
NPS | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ |
Visual feedback | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Customer surveys | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ |
API | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Live support | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ |
Click rage detection | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Insights | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ |
Free trial | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Analysis of dynamic elements | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ |
If you want to learn more about how FullSession compares to other session recording software like Crazyegg, Mouseflow, and FullStory, check out our CrazyEgg vs Mouseflow vs FullStory, Mouseflow vs VWO, and Hotjar vs Mixpanel comparisons.
So far, we’ve compared Hotjar and Smartlook based on their features, integration, deployment, pricing, support, use cases, and language. While each software shares similar features like visitor recordings, and heatmaps, there are other cases where their features contrast.
For example, Smartlook relies on features like funnels, events, and retention tables to understand the why behind customer behavior. In contrast, Hotjar relies on customer feedback forms and surveys to ask customers about their experience.
Both software lacks certain features, such as tracking user behavior in real time. In this case, FullSession is a better alternative. It also provides interactive heatmaps that let you track user interaction with dynamic web elements like hamburger menus, hidden items, and pop-ups.
FullSession Insights helps you gain a bird’s eye view of user behavior and pain points that may lead to funnel dropout and impact conversion rates.
With FullSession, you can:
The FullSession platform offers a 14-day free trial and three paid plans: Starter, Business, and Enterprise. A yearly subscription can save you up to 20%!
Here are more details on each plan.
If you need more information, you can get a demo.
Smartlook offers more detailed user recordings and event tracking, while Hotjar is known for its user-friendly interface and features like surveys. For a comprehensive tool with advanced error tracking, consider FullSession.
Hotjar is easier to set up and use, and it is ideal for beginners. Smartlook offers deeper insights with detailed recordings. FullSession provides a balance of ease of use and detailed analytics. It all boils down to your budget, web analytics needs, and personal preference.
Hotjar offers seamless integration with many popular tools, such as WordPress and HubSpot. Smartlook also integrates well with various platforms, especially for detailed session analysis. FullSession enhances these capabilities with robust integration options, making it easy to unify your analytics across different tools.
Both prioritize user privacy and comply with GDPR. FullSession offers enhanced privacy features, excluding sensitive data and providing real-time alerts for improved user trust.
Hotjar excels with intuitive heatmaps and visual feedback tools. Smartlook provides detailed session replays and event-based analytics. FullSession combines the strengths of both with advanced data visualization and real-time insights to offer a more comprehensive view of user behavior.
Both Smartlook and Hotjar offer a free version but with limited features. You can also opt for Google Analytics if you want to try some basic website analytics tools, especially if you run Google ads. However, FullSession offers better value than these three tools at only $39 a month (or $32 if you sign up for the annual plan!)