Reproduce it from the session, and triage by what it actually costs.

Link every error to the session, logs, network, and performance context—then rank the queue by business impact.

Who runs their triage through FullSession?

Engineering and QA teams at software and ecommerce companies, using it to reproduce faster and prioritize by business impact.

Engineering leaders

Cut MTTR, reduce firefighting, and give your team clear evidence for prioritizing bug fixes alongside roadmap work.

Senior engineers

Jump from a ticket or error into the session behind it and see console logs, network calls, and DOM changes on one timeline.

QA engineers

Record and share exact reproduction paths from pre-production and production, reducing back-and-forth with developers.

SRE & platform

Correlate frontend behavior with incidents, errors, and degraded experiences to see how outages affect users in real time.

Why reproducing a revenue-blocking bug takes so long

A vague ticket without browser, device, steps, or error context turns reproduction into hours of guesswork—and severity into whoever escalates loudest.

Open the exact broken session

Start with the real browser, device, path, user actions, and technical events—not a vague description.

Rank by customer impact

Group repeat failures and order the queue by affected customers, journey impact, and revenue at risk.

Share a reproducible ticket

Attach replay, logs, network response, and environment so engineering can begin at the failure.

What an engineering team gets

Real-session reproduction, severity ranked by customers and revenue, and proof the fix held—taking reproduction from days to minutes.

Reproduce bugs in minutes

Start from the session already linked to the error, not a description that must be recreated.

Triage by actual impact

Prioritize by affected customers and revenue—not raw volume or the loudest escalation.

Verify the fix holds

Measure against baseline after ship and reduce repeat-failure escalations by around 25%.

Bring evidence into AI safely

Query ranked errors and draft tickets through MCP in Claude or Cursor with inherited access and masking.

Lift AI

Turn a vague report into a ranked, reproducible ticket

Rank by journey impact, predict the lift before committing the fix, and prove the result after ship.

Teams use FullSession to turn behavior into proven outcomes.

"FullSession shows us exactly where users get stuck without digging through hours of recordings. It’s where we start when we know there’s something wrong and needs fixed. It was easy to launch and the FullSession team is super responsive and helpful."

Matt Fields
Head of Digital Marketing & AI Strategy, ECI Solutions

12x

Increased conversions

5x

Growth rate

Safe to connect to your workflow and AI tools

Review real sessions and query technical context without exposing protected values.

Mask before capture

Mask fields, elements, or entire pages at capture, so sensitive data never reaches FullSession. Add playback masking and honor user consent or opt-out preferences.

Enforce least-privilege access

Use browser-side masking, RBAC, SSO/SAML, audit logs, GDPR, CCPA and PCI support, US/EU residency, and permission-inherited MCP access.

Keep MCP inside existing permissions

Enterprise-ready security reviews, uptime SLAs, and independently verified safeguards. Data is hosted in the US, with European residency available on request.

Multiple Integrations built in the platform because we want no resitance in your workflow

Engineering & QA playbook.

Connect errors, session evidence, and release proof to fix issues faster.

Contact us

 Frequently Asked Questions.

How does an error connect to the session it happened in?

Frontend and backend errors are linked to the session, so you see the exact path, inputs, and state, plus console and network context, rather than a stack trace alone.

What can the MCP server do?

It brings FullSession into Claude and Cursor so engineers can query session and error context in plain language and act on it. Access inherits the permissions the signed-in user already has.

How do we decide which bugs to fix first?

By journey impact in Errors & Alerts, and by predicted revenue impact in Lift AI.

Does this replace our error monitoring tool?

It complements it, adding the session, customer, and revenue context stack-trace-first tools do not carry.

Can support use it without an engineering handoff?

Yes, provided their role has access, they can open the linked session and confirm what happened before escalating.

Reproduce the next one in minutes, and fix the one that actually costs money.

Growth sees conversion, Product sees friction, and Engineering sees the exact technical context
behind it.